Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Current Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blok, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pesticides in the Risk Society

The View from Everyday Life

Mette Jensen

National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, mje{at}dmu.dk

Anders Blok

Department of Sociology, Copenhagen University, abl{at}soc.ku.dk

Ulrich Beck's diagnosis in his already classic book Risk Society addressed, when it was first published in 1986, a number of new and important issues concerning environment and society. In spite of the weight of the theoretical contributions of the book, it appears, however, somewhat unsubstantiated in empirical terms. Similarly, the `macroscopic' level of Beck's analysis often seems insensitive to variations in risk concerns within and between different countries, regions or localities. These interrelated characteristics of the risk society discussion serve as the background for the approach in this article: to discuss central theoretical propositions related to the risk society diagnosis by drawing on an empirical case study of the risk perception with regard to pesticides. Pesticides are by nature `designer toxins' and as such a `risky' technological development, detectable only by experts' `sense apparatus', and surrounded by expert disagreements, multiple interests and substantial media attention. In other words, this case study can be said to be `paradigmatic' and may hence have wider applicability within risk society debates. On this basis, the authors argue in particular that social processes of perceiving, of `viewing' and making sense of risk, are much more multifarious than allowed by the risk society framework.

Key Words: Ulrich Beck • environment • pesticides • lay—expert relationship • risk

Current Sociology, Vol. 56, No. 5, 757-778 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392108093834


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?