| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Decision-Making and Ante-Natal Screening for Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia DisordersTo What Extent do Faith and Religious Identity Mediate Choice?University of York, ka512{at}york.ac.uk
University of Leeds, s.ahmed{at}leeds.ac.uk
University of Leeds, j.hewison{at}leeds.ac.uk
University of York, jmg502{at}york.ac.uk When making decisions about prenatal diagnosis, couples not only draw on their understanding of the condition but also broader aspects of their cultural identity. This article looks at how faith and religion mediate attitudes towards screening, prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for sickle cell and thalassaemia disorders. The article specifically reports on a qualitative study, which used focus groups from a variety of faith communities (Muslim, Sikh, Hindu and Christian), at risk of haemoglobin disorders, living in England. Our findings suggest that the decision about whether or not to have diagnostic testing generally related to attitudes towards the termination of pregnancy. The consequences of the condition were as important as religious beliefs to most people. More generally, faith beliefs emerged as negotiable and contingent: realized within a broader moral framework. Religion was felt not to be prescriptive and reproductive decisions were seen as personal. When making decisions, people utilize faith within a broader context of individual, family and social relationships.
Key Words: ethnicity • prenatal diagnosis • religious identity
Current Sociology, Vol. 56, No. 1,
77-98 (2008) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
