This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by de Beer, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How Individualized are the Dutch?

Amsterdam Institute of Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS), p.t.debeer{at}uva.nl

Individualization is often considered to be one of the most important social-cultural trends of the last decades. According to authors such as Ulrich Beck, Scott Lash and Anthony Giddens, it is one of the defining characteristics of late or `reflexive' modernity. However, there is not much empirical research on the phenomenon of individualization. This article examines the empirical evidence for a trend of individualization in the Netherlands. Three alleged consequences of the individualization process, namely detraditionalization, emancipation and heterogenization, are analysed using Dutch data. Only the hypothesis of detraditionalization is confirmed by the data. The emancipation hypothesis is, however, unambiguously refuted by the available data, while the data are not conclusive with respect to heterogenization. Hence, the empirical support for the individualization trend is much weaker than is often supposed.

Key Words: detraditionalization • emancipation • heterogenization • individualization • late modernity

Current Sociology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 389-413 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392107076082


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?