Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Social Problems, 2e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Current Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brighenti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Visibility

A Category for the Social Sciences

Andrea Brighenti

University of Trento, andrea.brighenti{at}soc.unitn.it

Can visibility be counted as a general category for the social sciences? The attempt to provide an answer to this question entails both describing actual phenomena of visibility, and defining the characteristics of visibility as a workable, unified category. This article analyses the relational, strategic and processual aspects of visibility as constituting a single field. The importance of this field is rooted in the deep epistemology of seeing present in our society, as well as in its ratio vis-a-vis the other human sensory dimensions and extensions. At the substantive level, the article addresses the question of the ambivalences of visibility and its effects, according to social places and subjects. Recognition and control are understood and explained as two opposing outcomes of visibility. It is argued that empowerment does not rest univocally either with visibility (as it is assumed by the tradition of recognition) or with invisibility (as it is assumed by the arcana imperii tradition).

Key Words: media • recognition • sociological categories • surveillance • visibility

Current Sociology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 323-342 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392107076079
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
D. D. Roberts, L. Morgan Roberts, R. M. O'Neill, and S. D. Blake-Beard
The Invisible Work of Managing Visibility for Social Change: Insights From the Leadership of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr
Business Society, December 1, 2008; 47(4): 425 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Feminism PsychologyHome page
I. Tischner and H. Malson
Exploring the Politics of Women's In/Visible `Large' Bodies
Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2008; 18(2): 260 - 267.
[PDF]

Home page
 Social CompassHome page
I. Turina
Secularization as a Property of Action
Social Compass, June 1, 2007; 54(2): 161 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]