| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0011392107070137 Performativity of Risk and the Boundaries of Economic SociologyUniversity of Bielefeld Much energy in economic sociology is expended on showing that core assumptions of microeconomics are too short sighted. It is assumed that sociology provides a better background for analysing and understanding economic institutions than economics itself. This is certainly true, but has led economic sociologists to treat economic theory as the other of economic sociology. Thereby, the disciplinary boundary between economics and sociology is reproduced where economic sociology is understood the application of the sociology tradition to economic phenomena. This article suggests a change of perspective: economic sociologists should treat economics as an endogenous part of its enquiries, but not to examine what economic theory is, but what it does, i.e. how economic theory shapes the economy. This requires introducing the study of language, concepts and semantic distinctions as an inherent part of economic sociology and its focus on the social construction of economic institutions. Ultimately, this suggestion reorients our focus away from authors to concepts. In other words, if economic sociology wants to take the sociological and linguistic turn in social theory with its focus on language seriously, it needs to redefine its boundaries.
Key Words: asymmetric information currency crises performativity risk uncertainty
|