Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Current Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Genetic-Social Science and the Study of Human Biotechnology

Tim Owen

University of Liverpool and the Open University in the North West

We require an ontologically flexible, meta-theoretical framework in order to study the ethical implications of genomics and the social construction of the Genome Project. It is argued in this article that a modification of Sibeon'santi-reductionist sociology, which focuses upon agency–structure, micro–macro and time–space, to include a focus uponthe biological variable, psychobiography andpower would be a ‘starting point’ for a sociology of genomics. The intention is to ‘build bridges’ between sociology and biology, to combine a modified anti-reductionist framework with some of the insights into the sociology–biology divide from the work of Benton, Bury, Hochschild, Layder and Newton for the purpose of conceptualizing the sociological implications of genomics. The termgenetic-social science is used to describe the new framework in order to distance it from the association withsociobiology. Such a post-postmodern approach is not reductionist or essentialist. It acknowledges that genesdo influence behaviour, yet ‘environment’ is still extremely important.

Key Words: anti-reductionist • biological variable • genetic-social science • post-postmodern • psychobiography

Current Sociology, Vol. 54, No. 6, 897-917 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392106068457
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?