This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Morgan, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Autochthonous Australian Syncretism

Most Aboriginal Australians now live in cities and towns amid the accoutrements of modernity and the cultural influences of globalization. They practise a way of life very different from that of their ancestors. Nevertheless, the dominant public representations of Aboriginal people and culture are traditional and primordial. Most autochthonous urban dwellers embrace these representations even though they bear little resemblance to their own lives. Stuart Hall and Paul Gilroy have criticized the tendency to reduce ethnicity to an essence or grounding tradition. They advocate viewing ethnic cultures as mixtures combining both residual and contemporary elements. However, many Aboriginal people embrace essentialist collective symbols in order to escape the stigma of `fringe dwelling', of being caught between autochthonous and colonial societies and belonging to neither.

Key Words: Aboriginal • community • essentialism • tradition • urbanization

Current Sociology, Vol. 51, No. 3-4, 433-451 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392103051003015


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?