Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Current Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herkenrath, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Quantitative Cross-National Analysis as a Research Tool in the Sociology of Developing Countries: A Critical Examination

Mark Herkenrath

Quantitative cross-national analysis (CNA) is one of the most frequently used research methods in empirical sociology, particularly in research on developing countries. Its frequent application implies that CNA is a useful instrument that yields trustworthy results. However, numerous criticisms, which call into question the method's legitimacy, can be found in the relevant literature. This article discusses the most important among these criticisms, and explores three particularly problematic issues: comparability of national societies, case independence, and accuracy of `official' data material. Although these issues represent potential difficulties and shortcomings of quantitative cross-national research, there are elegant solutions. The article provides information about these solutions and demonstrates that CNA is indeed a useful research tool for sociologists.

Key Words: comparative research design • cross-national analysis • developing countries • quantitative methodology

Current Sociology, Vol. 50, No. 4, 517-530 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392102050004003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
P. Ziltener and H.-P. Mueller
The Weight of the Past: Traditional Agriculture, Socio-political Differentiation and Modern Development in Africa and Asia: A Cross-National Analysis
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, October 1, 2007; 48(5): 371 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]