|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?
Brian Wynne
Risk and environmental discourses have usually been regarded as critical, in the sense that they are the substantive focus of critical reflexive processes discussed under the rubric of the risk society, reflexive modernization and other theories of late-modern cultural politics and change. The forces of power which shape new technological trajectories have encountered some of their most effective criticism in the form of environmental risk critique and feminist critique. However, even environmental risk discourses have been fundamentally shaped by an assumption that any uncertainties which risk assessments might show will be resolvable by more science. The basic discourse of modern science and technology policy - that even if predictive control is not yet fully in our grasp, it soon will be - is not challenged by the cultural focus on risk. Indeed, the recent emphasis on rendering risk and regulatory science more accountable, inclusive and transparent, actually diverts attention from the more difficult upstream arena of rendering innovation-oriented science more democratically accountable. In key respects, prevailing risk and environmental discourses can be seen to act by default as covers, and thus legitimators, of existing privileged forces driving technological innovation trajectories.
Key Words: ambiguity • environment • implicit representation • reflexivity • risk
Current Sociology, Vol. 50, No. 3,
459-477 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392102050003010
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. E. W. Broerse, T. de Cock Buning, A. Roelofsen, and J. F. G. Bunders
Evaluating Interactive Policy Making on Biotechnology: The Case of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport
Bulletin of Science Technology Society,
December 1, 2009;
29(6):
447 - 463.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Delicado
Scientific controversies in museums: notes from a semi-peripheral country
Public Understanding of Science,
November 1, 2009;
18(6):
759 - 767.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Davies, E. McCallie, E. Simonsson, J. L. Lehr, and S. Duensing
Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy
Public Understanding of Science,
May 1, 2009;
18(3):
338 - 353.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Carolan
The Bright- and Blind-Spots of Science: Why Objective Knowledge is not Enough to Resolve Environmental Controversies
Crit Sociol,
September 1, 2008;
34(5):
725 - 740.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Carolan
Democratizing Knowledge: Sustainable and Conventional Agricultural Field Days as Divergent Democratic Forms
Science Technology Human Values,
July 1, 2008;
33(4):
508 - 528.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Davies
Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists About Talking to the Public
Science Communication,
June 1, 2008;
29(4):
413 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Potts, R. Dixey, and S. Nettleton
Precautionary tales: Exploring the obstacles to debating the primary prevention of breast cancer
Critical Social Policy,
May 1, 2008;
28(2):
115 - 135.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Shields
Hope and Fear in Biotechnology: The Space-Times of Regulatory Affect
Space and Culture,
May 1, 2008;
11(2):
125 - 141.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lengwiler
Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective
Science Technology Human Values,
March 1, 2008;
33(2):
186 - 200.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Stirling
"Opening Up" and "Closing Down": Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology
Science Technology Human Values,
March 1, 2008;
33(2):
262 - 294.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bonneuil, P.-B. Joly, and C. Marris
Disentrenching Experiment: The Construction of GM--Crop Field Trials As a Social Problem
Science Technology Human Values,
March 1, 2008;
33(2):
201 - 229.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P. Rudy and J. Konefal
Nature, Sociology, and Social Justice: Environmental Sociology, Pedagogy, and the Curriculum
American Behavioral Scientist,
December 1, 2007;
51(4):
495 - 515.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Corfee-Morlot, M. Maslin, and J. Burgess
Global warming in the public sphere
Phil Trans R Soc A,
November 15, 2007;
365(1860):
2741 - 2776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Mythen
Reappraising the Risk Society Thesis: Telescopic Sight or Myopic Vision?
Current Sociology,
November 1, 2007;
55(6):
793 - 813.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Webster
Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room
Science Technology Human Values,
July 1, 2007;
32(4):
458 - 478.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Carolan
The Precautionary Principle and Traditional Risk Assessment: Rethinking How We Assess and Mitigate Environmental Threats
Organization Environment,
March 1, 2007;
20(1):
5 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Rydin
Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory
Planning Theory,
March 1, 2007;
6(1):
52 - 68.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Goven
Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power: Scientific Citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification
Science Technology Human Values,
September 1, 2006;
31(5):
565 - 598.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Irwin
The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the 'New' Scientific Governance
Social Studies of Science,
April 1, 2006;
36(2):
299 - 320.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Wynne
Reflexing Complexity: Post-genomic Knowledge and Reductionist Returns in Public Science
Theory Culture Society,
October 1, 2005;
22(5):
67 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Cook, E. Pieri, and P. T. Robbins
'The Scientists Think and the Public Feels': Expert Perceptions of the Discourse of GM Food
Discourse Society,
July 1, 2004;
15(4):
433 - 449.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Wynne
Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002)
Social Studies of Science,
June 1, 2003;
33(3):
401 - 417.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
