Current Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zafirovski, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Current Sociology, Vol. 47, No. 1, 47-113 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392199047001005

What is Really Rational Choice? Beyond the Utilitarian Concept of Rationality

Milan Zafirovski

Hailed by its exponents as a unifying paradigm for social theory and dismissed by its critiques as an imperialistic intrusion into sociology coming from neoclassical economics, rational choice theory is one of the most significant and controversial developments in contemporary sociological theory. This report reconsiders the degree of adequacy of rational choice theory for modern sociology. The report focuses its attention on the concept of rationality in rational choice theory. The major assumption or implication of modern rational choice theory, just as the old utilitarianism and neoclassical economics, is the status of human rationality as ipso facto utilitarian-economic rationality, namely the maximization of utility, profit or wealth, and alternatively the minimization of costs and other `disutilities'. This assumption is re-examined in this report. The point of departure of this examination is the argument that rational choice broadly understood is not necessarily utilitarian-economic rationality, namely utility- or profit-optimizing behavior.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Legal StudiesHome page
A. Mumford
Towards a Fiscal Sociology of Tax Credits and the Fathers' Rights Movement
Social Legal Studies, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 217 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
S.-Y. Ma
Political Science at the Edge of Chaos? The Paradigmatic Implications of Historical Institutionalism
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 57 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]