This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lockie, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Chemical Risk and the Self-Calculating Farmer: Diffuse Chemical Use in Australian Broadacre Farming Systems

Diffuse chemical use and pollution in agriculture create a number of risks, generating concern about food contamination, environmental degradation, health and safety and agricultural sustainability. While ecological inter-dependence ensures these risks have global implications, they do raise the interesting paradox that at the point of application farmers seem to constitute both cause and victim. However, while Australian broadacre farmers profess high levels of anxiety about using agricultural chemicals, their use continues to intensify. Farmers argue they have little choice in this if they are to maintain economic viability, but there is clearly more at work here than the playing out of the structural imperatives of capitalist accumulation. Technological innovation and productivity improvement are important elements of farmers' self-understandings of good farming practice, leading them into close association with agri-science institutions that promote intensification. Concerns about chemical use are alleviated by technologies of knowledge that lend an aura of objectivity to information that almost inevitably promotes input use. Further, a number of discursive strategies are employed by agri-businesses to associate chemical use with risk reduction, as well as with environmental and social responsibility. While the idea that farmers are simply dominated by more powerful interests is problematic, the diffuse deployment of disciplinary power through a range of social practices makes the likelihood of any fundamental realignment of the trajectory of agricultural development from within seem remote.

Current Sociology, Vol. 45, No. 3, 81-97 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/001139297045003005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Lockie Collective Agency, Non-Human Causality and Environmental Social Movements: A Case Study of the Australian 'Landcare Movement' Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2004; 40(1): 41 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF]