Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Social Problems, 2e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Current Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freudenburg, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Contamination, Corrosion and the Social Order: An Overview

William R. Freudenburg

The social impacts of technological disasters are more severe than those of natural disasters. Three factors are involved in explaining this disparity. First, many of the most severe impacts are associated not with simple physical destruction, but with the ambiguity of harm. Many of the most disturbing forms of technological contamination cannot be detected by the naked eye or by the other unaided senses; many cannot be assessed after the fact even with sophisticated equipment; and many can never be said definitively to have ended, or for that matter, not to have ended. Second, unlike natural disasters - which often lead to the emergence of a `therapeutic' community, with an outpouring of spontaneous as well as official assistance to victims - technological disasters tend to be followed by the emergence of corrosive communities, often characterized by lawyers who act to limit the potential liability of their clients, but whose net effect is often to blame the victims, to divide the community and to delay or to prevent the start of recovery. Finally, technological disasters can create widespread sociocultural disruption and concerns over recreancy, raising disturbing questions about the trustworthiness of societal institutions on which we all depend.

Current Sociology, Vol. 45, No. 3, 19-39 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/001139297045003002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cultural SociologyHome page
F. Furedi
From the Narrative of the Blitz to the Rhetoric of Vulnerability
Cultural Sociology, July 1, 2007; 1(2): 235 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
F. Vandermoere
The Process of Soil Excavation in a Community: Site-Specific Determinants of Stress Perception
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2006; 38(5): 715 - 739.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
B. K. Marshall, J. S. Picou, and C. A. Bevc
Ecological Disaster as Contextual Transformation: Environmental Values in a Renewable Resource Community
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2005; 37(5): 706 - 728.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Current SociologyHome page
E. Larana
Reflexivity, Risk and Collective Action Over Waste Management: A Constructive Proposal
Current Sociology, January 1, 2001; 49(1): 23 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]